Balm ingredients

Propolis: the hive material behind most beeswax allergy reports

Propolis extract at 0.1 to 2 percent, flavonoid content, alcohol removal, and the contact allergy data that makes it the first suspect in a beeswax reaction.

Propolis is the resin bees gather from tree buds and bark, mix with wax and enzymes, and use to seal, varnish and disinfect the hive. It is also the most likely reason a beeswax balm made somebody itch. This page covers what is in it, which extract form actually works in an anhydrous base, how much to use, what the patch test data really says, and what you may and may not claim for it in the UK and EU.

Short answer

Use propolis at 0.1 to 2 percent as resin solids, with 0.3 to 0.5 percent the usual working level in a balm. Drive the ethanol off a tincture before it goes near the oil phase. Clinics testing consecutive dermatitis patients report roughly 2 to 4 percent positivity to standard propolis preparations, which is high for a cosmetic ingredient. Declare it plainly, and claim nothing therapeutic.

  • INCI: Propolis Extract
  • 0.1 to 2% resin solids
  • 40-55% resin, 25-35% wax
  • Frequent contact allergen
  • Not vegan

What propolis is made of

Raw propolis is not one substance. It is plant resin, bee wax, volatile oils and hive debris in proportions that shift with the forage available, the season and how the beekeeper collected it. Scraped propolis carries more wood and paint fragments than propolis harvested from a plastic collection mat, and the difference shows up in the extract yield.

Composition bands for raw propolis as reported across the apicultural and phytochemical literature. These are typical ranges, not a specification, and individual samples fall outside them in both directions.
FractionTypical shareWhat it contributes
Resins and balsams40-55%The active fraction: flavonoids, phenolic acids and their esters. Colour, smell, stickiness and the allergy risk all live here.
Waxes25-35%Beeswax plus plant waxes from the bud exudate. Inert filler in a balm, and the reason a crude extract stiffens a formula slightly.
Volatile and aromatic oils5-10%The balsamic, resinous, faintly medicinal smell. Largely lost if you heat the extract hard.
Pollen2-5%Protein, amino acids, trace nutrients. No formulation function, and a reason to filter.
Minerals and debris3-5%Wood, propolis mat plastic, bee fragments, soil. Removed by extraction and filtration.

Within the resin fraction, the compounds that get quoted are flavonoid aglycones (pinocembrin, galangin, chrysin, pinobanksin, apigenin), free phenolic acids (caffeic, ferulic, p-coumaric, cinnamic) and, importantly for the allergy section below, the caffeic acid esters. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, usually written CAPE, and 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate are the two names worth remembering, because they are the identified sensitisers rather than incidental markers. Total flavonoid content in raw temperate propolis commonly runs 2 to 6 percent by mass; standardised dry extracts are sold at 8 to 15 percent flavonoids, which is why a percentage on your formula sheet means nothing until you say which input it refers to.

Poplar, green and red are three materials with one name

Propolis chemistry follows the trees, not the bees. A European propolis and a Brazilian green propolis share a name, a smell family and almost nothing else on a chromatogram. If a supplier will not tell you the botanical and geographic origin, you do not know what you have bought.

The three commercially significant propolis chemotypes, with the marker compounds used to identify each in the published chemical characterisation literature.
TypePlant source and regionMarker compoundsAppearance and smell
Poplar (the default)Populus bud exudate. Europe, North America, temperate Asia, New ZealandFlavonoid aglycones plus caffeate esters including CAPEDark brown to greenish brown, strong balsamic resin note
Green BrazilianBaccharis dracunculifolia, Brazilian cerradoPrenylated cinnamic acids: artepillin C, drupanin, baccharin. Low flavonoid, little or no CAPEOlive to yellow green, sharper and more herbaceous
Red Brazilian and CubanDalbergia ecastaphyllum, coastal mangroveIsoflavonoids: vestitol, neovestitol, medicarpin, formononetinDeep red brown, stains, sweeter and less sharp

Two other types turn up in trade: Mediterranean propolis from Cupressaceae, rich in diterpenes rather than flavonoids, and Pacific propolis from Macaranga species, characterised by prenylated flavanones. Both behave differently again. Practically, the chemotype decides the colour you will get in a pale balm and, as the allergy section sets out, may change the sensitisation risk. It does not much change the usage level.

Which extract to buy

The form matters more than the percentage, because most of the forms sold are simply not compatible with an anhydrous product.

Commercial propolis input forms and their fit for an anhydrous balm. Solids content figures are the ranges suppliers typically quote; confirm each against the lot documentation.
FormResin solidsFit for a balm
Ethanolic tincture (EEP)10-30%Workable only after the ethanol is removed. The commonest form and the one most often misused.
Dry or spray dried extract90-100%Best choice. Weighs accurately, standardised to a flavonoid figure, dissolves into warm oil with stirring.
Oil macerate or oil soluble extract1-10%Convenient, but you are buying mostly carrier oil. Check what the stated percentage refers to.
Glycolic extract (propylene glycol)2-10%Poor. Polar solvent, will not disperse in a fat base.
Glycerin extract2-10%Worst. Beads out, drags water in, and extracts the lipophilic actives badly in the first place.
Raw propolis chunks40-55%Cheap and unpredictable. Freeze and grind before extraction; expect wax and debris in the result.

The glycol and glycerin forms are the trap. They are the standard propolis inputs for serums and toners, they are widely stocked, and they will not go into a balm. Adding a glycerin extract to a molten butter and wax base gives you visible beads and, once cooled, a mottled surface with sticky spots. The physical chemistry behind that is set out in solubility in anhydrous formulas, and the wider problem of polar ingredients in a fat base is the same one described under glycerin and humectants. Any water riding in with them is also a contamination route worth taking seriously, for the reasons in moisture control.

Getting the alcohol out of a tincture

A tincture is 70 to 96 percent ethanol by volume. Poured into a hot oil phase it flashes off unevenly, spits, carries the aroma compounds away with it and leaves you with no idea how much resin actually stayed behind. Reduce it separately and weigh the endpoint.

  1. Work out the target solids. A tincture labelled 20 percent leaves 0.2 g of resin per gram. For 0.5 percent resin in a 100 g batch you need 0.5 g of solids, so weigh 2.5 g of tincture.
  2. Weigh the empty dish, then the tincture into it. Record both. Use a shallow glass or stainless dish, not plastic, and give it as much surface area as you can.
  3. Reduce over a water bath at 50 to 60 C. Away from any flame or hot plate element. Ethanol vapour is flammable and this is the step where people get careless. Ventilate the room.
  4. Stop when the mass hits the calculated endpoint. Dish plus 0.5 g in the example. It will be a dark, tacky, brittle residue that will not scrape out cleanly.
  5. Dissolve the residue in part of the oil phase. Add 5 to 10 g of the batch oil to the same dish and warm to 60 to 70 C with stirring until the residue is fully in solution, then add that to the main batch. Dissolving in the dish is what recovers the material you would otherwise leave behind.
Careful

Do not reduce a tincture on an open gas ring, an electric hob element or a naked induction plate. Use a water bath, keep the vessel wide and shallow, and do not leave it. If any ethanol survives into the finished balm it also has to appear on the ingredient list as Alcohol, which is a labelling problem as well as a sensory one.

Add the dissolved resin at the same point you would add any heat sensitive material, at the low end of your working window rather than into the boiling wax. The general rules for that window are in pour temperatures. Propolis resin itself softens somewhere around 60 to 70 C and is brittle when cold, so it will not seize in a normal balm; the concern is aroma loss and darkening, not solubility.

How much to use, and what you get at each level

All figures below are resin solids as a percentage of the finished balm, not tincture weight. Propolis is a colouring, scenting, tackifying ingredient at every level that does anything, so the ceiling is usually set by the sensory result long before it is set by safety.

Observed effect of propolis resin solids in a pale beeswax and shea base. Colour and tack descriptions are sensory, not instrument measurements, and a dark green Brazilian extract shifts colour faster than a poplar one.
Resin solidsColour in a pale baseSmellFeel
0.1%None visibleFaint sweet resin under the base noteNo change
0.3%Warm honey tintClearly present, still a background noteNo change
0.5%AmberDistinctly propolis, competes with light fragranceVery slight tack on the fingertip
1%Mid brown, opaqueDominant balsamic resinNoticeable tack, slight drag on application
2%Dark brown, will mark a pale fabricOverwhelms most fragrance choicesSticky, and the balm sits on the skin rather than spreading

Zero point three to 0.5 percent is where most balms should land. Below 0.1 percent you are paying for an ingredient list entry. Above 2 percent you are making a resin salve, not a balm, and the closest useful comparison is the handling of tree resin described in pine resin salve, which is tacky by design. If the smell is fighting your fragrance rather than adding to it, the diagnosis is in balm smells too strong, and the answer is usually less propolis rather than more fragrance.

The allergy data, without the exaggeration

Propolis is a well characterised contact allergen, and the sensitisers are the caffeic acid esters in the resin. It is patch tested at 10 percent in petrolatum in the standard preparations, and it cross reacts with balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae), colophony, benzoin and poplar bud, so a person positive to any of those has a raised chance of reacting to a propolis balm.

Published patch test positivity to propolis in clinic populations. These are patients referred with suspected contact dermatitis, so the figures overstate the rate in the general population; note also how much the test material itself changes the result.
Population and test materialTestedPositive
NACDG consecutive patients, Chinese propolis (2019)2,2603.7%
NACDG consecutive patients, Brazilian propolis (2020)1,83814.7%
NACDG consecutive patients, Chinese propolis (2021-22)3,0522.2%
Swedish consecutive patients, four propolis origins7222.4-3.6%
German beekeepers, self reported reactions1,0513.6%

Three things follow from that table. First, propolis sits among the more frequent cosmetic allergens: a 2 to 4 percent positivity rate in a dermatitis clinic puts it in the same territory as fragrance mix components rather than with the inert structural materials. Second, the test material matters enormously. The Brazilian preparation returned 14.7 percent in one season against 2.2 percent for a Chinese preparation two years later in the same testing programme, a spread that says as much about the preparation as about propolis itself. Third, the beekeeper story is more moderate than it is usually told. In a survey of 1,051 German beekeepers, 3.6 percent reported allergic reactions to propolis, and only about a quarter of those had recognised the allergy before being asked. Occupational exposure raises risk and, more interestingly, it hides it.

For a maker, the practical consequences are ordinary. Propolis is not an ingredient to hide in a formula sold as gentle. It should be declared clearly on the pack, for which the conventions are in reading a balm label. If a customer reports burning or itching, propolis is the first thing to look at, ahead of essential oils, and the elimination approach is set out in balm stings or burns. Anyone with a known reaction to bee products should be pointed at how to patch test a balm before they use a whole tin, and the same logic that applies to declared fragrance allergens applies here even though propolis is not on the EU allergen list.

Why propolis travels with beeswax, and what filtering will not do

Bees do not keep propolis and wax in separate compartments. Propolis is smeared over comb, frames and cappings, so rendered wax carries it in, and the caffeate esters are lipophilic, which means they dissolve into molten wax rather than sitting on it as particles. That distinction is the whole point. Straining molten wax through muslin or a fine sieve removes pollen, wood, bee parts and undissolved propolis lumps. It does not remove anything already in solution.

Bleaching goes further. Filtration through activated carbon, the usual route to a white grade, adsorbs coloured and aromatic material and will take out a good deal of the dissolved propolis with it. That is why white beeswax smells of almost nothing and why reactions are reported more often with raw and yellow grades. But no pharmacopoeia monograph sets a propolis limit for either grade, no supplier certificate reports one, and there is no test you can run to declare a batch propolis free. The honest position is on the page for beeswax: bleached wax carries less, neither grade is guaranteed clear, and a person with a confirmed propolis allergy should treat all beeswax as suspect rather than trusting the grade. The full comparison of the two allergens is in beeswax and propolis allergy.

Note

The same logic covers honey in balms and raw honey generally, which also carry propolis traces. A customer who reacts to your honey lip balm and to your beeswax salve has probably not developed two allergies, and the free amino acids and water in honey are a separate problem again.

Standardisation and what a certificate should show

Because the plant source varies, propolis is one of the few balm ingredients where a supplier certificate carries real information rather than confirming the obvious. Ask for it before you order, not after.

Key facts
  • Botanical origin and country of harvest, named. Not "European propolis" but the species group and region.
  • Extraction solvent, strength and drug to extract ratio, plus dry residue percentage for a liquid.
  • Total polyphenols by Folin-Ciocalteu, reported as gallic acid equivalents.
  • Total flavonoids by the aluminium chloride colorimetric method, reported against quercetin or galangin. Dry extracts commonly specify 8 to 15 percent.
  • An HPLC or HPTLC fingerprint naming markers appropriate to the chemotype: CAPE and galangin for poplar, artepillin C for green, vestitol for red.
  • Heavy metals, with lead called out, and acaricide residues. Coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate and amitraz metabolites concentrate in hive materials.
  • Microbiological counts, and residual ethanol for a dried extract.

Two colorimetric numbers alone are weak evidence. Total polyphenol and total flavonoid assays both respond to compounds that are not the ones you are buying, and neither distinguishes a poplar extract from a green one. It is the fingerprint that tells you what the material is. The general approach to supplier documentation, including what to do when a supplier will not produce it, is in sourcing ingredients.

What you may claim in the UK and EU

Propolis has a genuine antimicrobial literature behind it, which is exactly why the claim rules bite. Under the EU Cosmetic Products Regulation 1223/2009, and the retained GB version of it, a cosmetic is defined by function: cleaning, perfuming, changing appearance, correcting body odours, protecting and keeping in good condition. Say that a balm kills bacteria, is antiseptic, heals a wound or treats a cold sore and you have described a medicinal product, which needs a marketing authorisation, and the MHRA applies a "presentation and function" test that looks at your whole marketing, not just the pack.

Claims that stay inside the cosmetic definition still have to satisfy the common criteria in Regulation (EU) 655/2013, retained in GB: legal compliance, truthfulness, evidential support, honesty, fairness and informed decision making. "Contains propolis, traditionally used in hive materials" is a statement about the ingredient. "Propolis balm for cuts" is not a cosmetic claim at all. The line, claim by claim, is worked through in cosmetic vs drug claims, and the notification and responsible person duties that sit behind it are in selling balms in the UK and EU.

One specific trap. Propolis is not listed in Annex V, the list of preservatives permitted in EU and GB cosmetics, so you cannot use it as a preservative or say that it preserves the product. A claim that the product resists microbial growth because of propolis also drifts towards biocidal product territory. In an anhydrous balm the question is moot for a different reason, set out in preservatives for anhydrous products: there is no water for organisms to grow in. Your safety assessor will want the propolis inclusion level, the extract documentation and a sensitisation rationale in the report, which is covered in safety assessment and the CPSR.

When propolis is the wrong ingredient

Propolis is a poor choice in four situations, and none of them is about efficacy. It does not belong in a product marketed as suitable for sensitive or reactive skin, because a 2 to 4 percent clinic positivity rate is not compatible with that positioning. It does not belong in a pale or delicately fragranced product, because at any level where it is doing something it is also colouring and scenting the batch. It rules the product out of a vegan range, along with beeswax, lanolin and honey, for the reasons in vegan and cruelty free labels. And it does not belong in anything you intend to describe as antibacterial, because the moment you say that, the product is no longer a cosmetic.

The decision rule is short. If you want a hive character in a salve, want the colour and smell to be part of the product, and are willing to declare a known allergen prominently, buy a standardised dry extract with a named botanical origin and run it at 0.3 to 0.5 percent resin solids. If you want the antimicrobial story, buy nothing, because you cannot sell it. And if you want an occlusive that clings and repairs chapped skin without an allergy conversation, lanolin does more work, though it brings its own sensitisation debate. Propolis is a character ingredient. Formulate it as one.

Frequently asked questions

How much propolis should I put in a balm?

Between 0.1 and 2 percent as resin solids, with 0.3 to 0.5 percent the usual working level. Measure the solids, not the tincture: a 20 percent tincture is only one fifth resin, so 2.5 g of it delivers 0.5 g of propolis. Above 1 percent the colour and balsamic smell take over the product.

Can I put propolis tincture straight into a balm?

No. A tincture is 70 to 96 percent ethanol, which spits in a hot oil phase, carries the aroma off unevenly and leaves you unsure how much resin stayed behind. Reduce it separately over a water bath at 50 to 60 C, away from any flame, until the dish reaches the calculated solids weight, then dissolve the residue in a little of the batch oil.

Is propolis vegan?

No. Propolis is collected, processed and deposited by honeybees, so it sits with beeswax, honey and royal jelly outside every vegan standard. Plant resins such as pine or mastic are not substitutes in any chemical sense, although they give a comparable tacky, balsamic character in a salve.

Why does a beeswax balm make my skin itch when beeswax is meant to be safe?

Because the reaction is usually to propolis rather than to the wax. Propolis is smeared through the hive, its caffeic acid esters dissolve into molten wax and survive ordinary straining, and it is a far more frequent contact allergen than beeswax itself. Bleached white wax carries less than raw or yellow grades, but no grade is certified free of it.

Is Brazilian green propolis less allergenic than European propolis?

Plausibly, because the known sensitisers are caffeic acid esters and green Brazilian propolis is characterised by prenylated cinnamic acids instead, with little or no CAPE. That is a chemical argument rather than a clinical one. Patch test surveillance has produced both higher and lower positivity figures for Brazilian preparations, so do not market it as the hypoallergenic option.

Does propolis preserve a balm?

Not in any way you can rely on or say. Propolis is not on Annex V, the list of preservatives permitted in EU and GB cosmetics, so it cannot be used or described as one. An anhydrous balm does not need a preservative anyway, because there is no water phase for organisms to grow in.

Can I say my propolis balm is antibacterial?

No. In the UK and EU an antibacterial, antiseptic, healing or wound care claim takes the product out of the cosmetic definition and into medicines or biocides law, regardless of what the propolis literature says. Cosmetic claims also have to meet the common criteria, which require evidential support for whatever you do say.

Sources and further reading

  1. North American Contact Dermatitis Group, Patch test results: 2019-2020 and 2021-2022, published in Dermatitis. Source of the 3.7, 14.7 and 2.2 percent propolis positivity figures.
  2. Antelmi A and colleagues, Prevalence of contact allergy to propolis: testing with different propolis patch test materials, Contact Dermatitis, 2025.
  3. Bankova V, Chemical diversity of propolis and the problem of standardization, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2005.
  4. Bankova V, Bertelli D, Borba R and colleagues, Standard methods for Apis mellifera propolis research, Journal of Apicultural Research, COLOSS BEEBOOK.
  5. Cosmetic Ingredient Review, Safety assessment of honey and honey-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics, Washington DC, which covers propolis, propolis extract and propolis cera.
  6. European Commission, Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 laying down common criteria for claims used in relation to cosmetic products, EUR-Lex.
  7. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, A guide to what is a medicinal product (MHRA Guidance Note 8), London.

Reviewed and updated 6 September 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix and log it.