Menthol, camphor and other actives: mechanism, levels and the drug line
How menthol cools through TRPM8, the real monograph levels for camphor and menthol (they are not in Part 348), the toxicity numbers, and whether menthol dries lips.
Menthol and camphor are the two ingredients that make a balm feel like it is doing something. That sensation is real, it is well understood at the receptor level, and it is also the reason both materials sit awkwardly across the line between a cosmetic and a regulated drug.
This page covers the mechanism, the levels commercial products use, which US monograph actually applies (it is not the one everybody cites), the toxicity figures worth quoting exactly, and the other actives makers keep asking about.
Menthol cools by opening the TRPM8 cold receptor, so the nerve reports cold that is not there. Camphor is a counter-irritant. The US levels usually credited to 21 CFR Part 348 are actually in OTC Monograph M017: camphor 0.1 to 3% and menthol 0.1 to 1% as analgesics, more as counterirritants.
How cooling actually works: TRPM8
TRPM8 is an ion channel in sensory nerve endings in skin and mucosa. It opens when the tissue drops below roughly 26 C, and the resulting signal is what the brain reads as cold. Menthol binds the channel and opens it at ordinary skin temperature, so the nerve fires while the skin sits at 32 C.
Three consequences follow, and they explain most of what people notice.
- Nothing is actually cooled. No heat leaves the tissue, so a menthol product does not reduce inflammation by cooling it.
- The sensation fades fast. The channel desensitises, so a strong hit of menthol reads as intense for a few minutes, then flattens. This is why menthol products invite reapplication.
- Real cold still registers. Going outside after applying a menthol balm genuinely feels colder, because the real cold and the chemical signal add up.
Menthyl lactate and the WS-series coolants (WS-3, WS-23) act on the same channel with far less odour and irritancy, which is why they dominate confectionery and modern lip products. Their use is covered in lip balm flavour and sweeteners.
What a counter-irritant is
A counter-irritant produces a mild, controlled surface sensation that competes for attention with a deeper discomfort. Menthol, camphor, methyl salicylate and capsicum are the classic examples. The mechanism is partly gate control, partly distraction, partly a modest local increase in blood flow.
A counter-irritant changes the sensation, not the underlying tissue, and anything beyond that is a therapeutic claim. Note the word inside the term: the mechanism is irritation, deliberately produced. That is why these materials suit already irritated skin badly, and why the strong versions belong in a muscle rub balm rather than a face product.
Camphor is the more complicated of the two. It smells cool but acts largely on warmth and pain channels rather than TRPM8, so a camphor balm reads as warming and slightly numbing. It is also the more toxic material if swallowed.
Typical levels in commercial products
Levels vary hugely because the category varies. A tinted lip balm and a chest rub are separated by a factor of fifty in menthol content.
- Lip balm, gentle cooling note: menthol 0.05 to 0.3%.
- Lip balm marketed as medicated: menthol often 0.5 to 1%, sometimes with camphor.
- Body or foot balm, noticeable cooling: menthol 0.5 to 2%.
- Chest rub at US monograph strength: camphor about 4.7 to 5.3% with menthol about 2.6 to 2.8%.
- Add all of these off the heat, below 50 to 60 C: menthol sublimes and camphor is volatile.
Worked example, weight percent of the total, totalling 100. A 250 g foot balm at 1% menthol needs 2.5 g of menthol crystals, dissolved into a portion of the warm liquid oil before the wax goes in. Undissolved crystals concentrate the sensation into points and sting.
Dissolve menthol crystals in a warm portion of the liquid oil, off the heat, and confirm the solution is clear before it goes near the wax. Crystals stirred into a thickening melt stay as crystals.
The line where a balm becomes a drug
In the United States a product is a cosmetic if it is intended to cleanse or beautify, and a drug if it is intended to treat, prevent or affect the structure or function of the body. Intent is shown by claims and by formulation, so a product can become a drug in two independent ways.
| Active | Typical cosmetic level | Effect | Regulatory flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menthol | 0.05-0.3% | TRPM8 cooling, mild counter-irritation | Drug active in the US at chest-rub and external analgesic strengths. IFRA and lip-product limits also apply to peppermint oil as a source |
| Camphor | 0.1-0.5% | Warming and numbing counter-irritant | Drug active at monograph strengths. Toxic if swallowed in quantity. Restricted in several markets |
| Eucalyptus oil | 0.1-0.5% | Aromatic, mild counter-irritant | No US OTC monograph status in any category, and non-GRASE for cold sores. Not near the face of under-2s |
| Methyl salicylate (wintergreen) | avoid | Strong warming counter-irritant | Counterirritant active at 10-60%. EU caps it at 0.06% leave-on and 0.03% on lips. Serious poisoning risk if swallowed |
| Capsicum oleoresin | 0.01-0.05% | TRPV1 warming, vasodilation | External analgesic active. Strong irritant, transfers on fingers |
| Allantoin | 0.2-0.5% | Softens keratin, mildly soothing | Skin protectant active at 0.5 to 2%. Below that it is used cosmetically |
| Zinc oxide | 1-10% | Opaque physical barrier, mild astringency | Skin protectant active at roughly 1 to 25%, and separately a sunscreen active. Either route is a drug |
| Salicylic acid | not for balms | Keratolytic, loosens the stratum corneum | Acne and wart drug active in the US. EU Annex III limits it to 0.5% in lip products and 2.0% elsewhere, and not for under-3s |
The claims side of the boundary catches far more small makers than the formulation side, and it is set out in cosmetic versus drug claims; what the label must then carry is in labelling cosmetics in the US. Sun protection is a separate case again, covered in SPF in lip balm.
Which monograph applies, and the Part 348 correction
Almost every craft source quoting menthol and camphor levels attributes them to 21 CFR Part 348. That is wrong: Part 348 as codified covers only male genital desensitising drug products. The levels people mean are in OTC Monograph M017, external analgesics, and the chest rub levels are elsewhere again, in the antitussive monograph at 21 CFR 341.74(d). The three sets are not interchangeable.
| Active | Stated use | Permitted level | Where it is set |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camphor | Analgesic, anaesthetic, antipruritic | 0.1-3% | Monograph M017 |
| Camphor | Counterirritant | above 3%, up to 11% | Monograph M017 |
| Menthol | Analgesic, anaesthetic, antipruritic | 0.1-1% | Monograph M017 |
| Menthol | Counterirritant | 1.25-16% | Monograph M017 |
| Methyl salicylate | Counterirritant | 10-60% | Monograph M017 |
| Camphor | Antitussive chest rub | 4.7-5.3% | 21 CFR 341.74(d) |
| Menthol | Antitussive chest rub | 2.6-2.8% | 21 CFR 341.74(d) |
Three further points rarely appear anywhere. Cold sore products are governed by 21 CFR 310.545(a)(10)(v), which makes camphor above 3%, menthol above 1%, methyl salicylate, eucalyptus oil, turpentine oil, capsaicin and eugenol non generally recognised as safe and effective for that use, so the popular homemade cold sore salve is built almost entirely from materials FDA has specifically excluded. Eucalyptus oil has no US OTC monograph status at all, in any category. And camphorated oil is a new drug requiring an approved application, which is why it left pharmacy shelves.
These levels change. Monographs are now amended by administrative order rather than rulemaking, and annex entries in the UK and EU are amended one regulation at a time. Read the current CFR or monograph text, and the current consolidated Annex III, before you rely on any figure here.
Skin protectants, and the beeswax surprise
The monograph that actually covers a lip balm is 21 CFR Part 347 (OTC Monograph M016). Section 347.3 defines a lip protectant drug product "traditionally called lip balm". Its permitted actives are ordinary balm materials at high percentages, which is why so many mainstream lip balms carry a Drug Facts panel.
- Petrolatum and white petrolatum: 30 to 100%. See petrolatum and mineral oil.
- Cocoa butter: 50 to 100%. Lanolin: 12.5 to 50%.
- Dimethicone: 1 to 30%. Zinc oxide: 1 to 25%. Allantoin: 0.5 to 2%.
The surprise is what is excluded. 21 CFR 310.545(a)(18)(i)(B) declares beeswax not generally recognised as safe and effective as a skin protectant active. That does not touch its use as a cosmetic ingredient, where it remains the backbone of most balms, but beeswax cannot be the claimed drug active on a Drug Facts panel. Shark liver oil is not a skin protectant either: it is an anorectal active under Part 346.
The under-2 rule, and the camphor numbers
Camphor, menthol and eucalyptus should not be applied to or near the face of children under 2. Applied around the nose and mouth of an infant they can provoke laryngospasm and breathing difficulty. Strong menthol or camphor chest products are not for infants at all. Camphor is also significantly toxic if swallowed, and small quantities have caused seizures in young children, so any camphor-containing product must be stored out of reach. If you make products for children, read lip balm for children before you formulate.
This is not a cautious house rule. It is the reason mainstream chest rubs carry an explicit age warning, and the reason a "gentle" homemade chest balm for a toddler is one of the more genuinely risky things a hobby maker can produce. The same logic constrains the aromatic load of a chest rub balm generally.
The published figures are worth quoting exactly rather than paraphrasing. Exposure to as little as 500 mg of camphor has been cited as a cause of mortality, 750 to 1000 mg is associated with seizures and death, and in children under 6 an exposure of 500 mg or more requires rapid triage (Love et al., Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004;27(1):49, PMID 15219304). Put that in balm terms: a chest rub at 5% camphor carries 500 mg in 10 g of product, which is a blob the size of a large grape.
Methyl salicylate is worse per millilitre. The poison control consensus guideline sets the referral threshold at more than a lick or taste of oil of wintergreen by a child under 6, or more than 4 mL by anyone aged 6 or over, either of which warrants emergency department referral (PMID 17364628). Wintergreen and sweet birch oils are 85 to 99% methyl salicylate, so a teaspoon is a genuine poisoning.
One study is routinely misused in this area. Abanses and colleagues reported that a vapour rub raised mucin secretion by 63% and lowered ciliary beat frequency by 35% (PMID 19136404). That is an excised ferret trachea model plus a single case report, not a human clinical trial, and consumer media present it as though it were. It is a reason for caution in infants and a reason not to use vapour rubs under the nose, not proof of harm in adults.
"Menthol dries my lips": what is plausibly happening
This complaint deserves a real answer rather than a dismissal. Menthol does not remove water from tissue and is not hygroscopic. Four mechanisms are plausible, and more than one is usually running at once.
- Irritant cheilitis. Lip vermilion has a thin stratum corneum, almost no sebaceous glands and a poor barrier. Repeated low-grade irritation, several times a day for weeks, produces exactly the dryness, scaling and fissuring people describe.
- Allergic contact cheilitis. Menthol and peppermint oil are documented contact allergens. Once sensitised, a person reacts at tiny doses and the reaction looks like severe chapping, which prompts more application of the offending product. The reaction is delayed by a day or two, which hides the connection.
- The behavioural loop. The cooling desensitises within minutes, so the product asks to be reapplied, which encourages lip pressing and licking. Evaporating saliva is genuinely drying and leaves digestive enzymes behind.
- The base, not the active. Medicated lip products are often built on thin, quick-absorbing bases so they do not feel heavy. A base with weak occlusion does less to slow water loss, so the lips are drier regardless of what the active is doing.
The diagnostic move is to change one variable: use an unscented, unmedicated balm with a strong occlusive load for two weeks. If the lips settle, the active or the fragrance was the problem. The wider argument, including why "lip balm addiction" is not a described condition while contact cheilitis very much is, sits in does lip balm dry your lips. Immediate stinging is triaged in balm stings or burns.
The other actives makers ask about
Allantoin is a white crystalline powder, poorly soluble in oil, used at 0.2 to 0.5% cosmetically and a skin protectant active at 0.5 to 2%. Grind it into a little oil first, or it stays as visible specks.
Panthenol is the one people most often waste. It is a humectant, and in an anhydrous formulation there is no water for it to hold and no solvent for it to dissolve in, so it separates as syrupy droplets. Adding it because the ingredient list looks better is a real cost with no benefit.
Zinc oxide disperses rather than dissolves and needs wetting, ideally in castor oil, then grinding. It gives opacity and a dry, astringent finish. Weigh it without raising dust, and remember that both the skin protectant and the sunscreen routes are drug categories.
Salicylic acid and phenol are not home formulation materials. Both are drug actives with real toxicity profiles, and salicylic acid is capped at 0.5% in lip products and 2.0% elsewhere under EU Annex III, and barred for children under 3.
A reasonable position for a maker
Sensory actives are legitimate and people like them. The mistake is treating the sensation as evidence of repair. Decide what the product is for: if the answer is occlusion and comfort, the actives add nothing and the effort belongs in the wax, butter and oil balance. If it is a cooling foot or muscle product, dose the menthol properly, dissolve it fully, keep it away from children and lips, cite the right monograph, and check the current text rather than a remembered percentage. Aromatic materials carry their own separate limits, in essential oils in balms.
Frequently asked questions
Is menthol bad in lip balm?
Not inherently, but it is a sensory ingredient with no barrier function, and at the levels that produce a strong tingle it is a mild irritant on thin lip skin. It is also a documented contact allergen. If your lips feel worse the more balm you use, menthol and peppermint are among the first ingredients to remove and retest.
Does menthol dry your lips?
Menthol does not remove water from lips directly. The plausible mechanisms are irritant cheilitis from repeated low-grade irritation, allergic contact cheilitis in sensitised people, and the behavioural loop where the cooling wears off in minutes and prompts reapplication and lip-licking. The base a menthol balm sits in matters more than the menthol, and a thin, volatile base makes it worse.
How does menthol make skin feel cold?
It binds TRPM8, an ion channel on sensory nerve endings that normally opens at low temperature. Opening the channel sends a cold signal to the brain regardless of the actual temperature of the skin. Nothing is cooled: no heat leaves the tissue. That is also why the sensation fades within minutes as the receptor desensitises.
Is camphor safe in a lip balm?
At the fractions of a percent used in commercial lip products it is a long-established cosmetic ingredient, but camphor is meaningfully toxic if swallowed. Exposure to as little as 500 mg has been cited as a cause of mortality, and 750 to 1000 mg is associated with seizures and death (PMID 15219304). It should not go near the face of a child under 2, and there is little reason to put it in a lip product at all.
When does a balm become a drug in the US?
When it is intended to affect the structure or function of the body or to treat a condition. Intent is shown by claims and by including an active at monograph levels. The relevant monographs are M017 for external analgesics, 21 CFR 341.74(d) for chest rubs and 21 CFR Part 347 for skin protectants, not 21 CFR Part 348, which as codified covers only male genital desensitisers.
Does panthenol work in an anhydrous balm?
Poorly. Panthenol is a hygroscopic, water-soluble liquid that works as a humectant, which means it needs water to attract and hold. In a balm with no water phase it will not dissolve into the oils, it tends to sit as droplets or sink out, and its humectant mechanism has nothing to act on. It belongs in a lotion or serum, or in a balm used over damp skin.
Can I put zinc oxide in a balm?
You can disperse it, but be clear which product you are making. Zinc oxide is an over-the-counter skin protectant active in the US at 1 to 25%, and separately a sunscreen active, so both routes carry drug obligations. It also needs proper wetting and grinding or it will feel gritty, and the loose powder should not be inhaled while you weigh it.
Is beeswax an approved skin protectant?
No. 21 CFR 310.545(a)(18)(i)(B) declares beeswax not generally recognised as safe and effective as a skin protectant active ingredient. That has no bearing on its use as a cosmetic ingredient, where it is the structural backbone of most balms, but it does mean beeswax cannot be the claimed drug active on a US Drug Facts panel. Shark liver oil is not a skin protectant either: it is an anorectal active under Part 346.
Sources and further reading
- National Library of Medicine, PubChem compound summary: menthol, NCBI.
- National Library of Medicine, PubChem compound summary: camphor, NCBI.
- US Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR 341, Cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator and antiasthmatic drug products for over-the-counter human use, topical nasal decongestant actives.
- US Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR 347, Skin protectant drug products for over-the-counter human use (OTC Monograph M016), including the lip protectant definition at 347.3.
- US Food and Drug Administration, OTC Monograph M017, External analgesic drug products for over-the-counter human use, and 21 CFR 310.545, drug products not generally recognized as safe and effective.
- Love et al., Are one or two dangerous? Camphor exposure in toddlers, Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004;27(1):49, PMID 15219304. See also PMID 17364628 and PMID 19136404.
- European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products, Annexes II and III.
- Cosmetic Ingredient Review, Safety assessments of menthol, camphor and related ingredients, Washington DC.
Reviewed and updated 6 September 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix and log it.