Making and scaling balms

Sustainable balm packaging: refills, recyclability and the fees you now pay

What actually gets recycled, how refill systems work for anhydrous products, and the UK producer responsibility and plastic tax duties a small brand can trigger.

Packaging is the part of a balm business the law reaches first, and the part where the intuitive answer is most often wrong. This page ranks the four common balm formats by what is genuinely recovered rather than by the symbol moulded into the base, gives the UK and EU thresholds that turn packaging into a reporting duty and a fee, and sets out what you can defensibly print about any of it.

Short answer

Aluminium is the best recovered of the four materials and one of the worst sorted formats, because a 45 mm tin falls through the screens at a sorting plant. UK Extended Producer Responsibility starts at 25 tonnes of packaging and 1 million pounds of turnover. Plastic Packaging Tax starts at 10 tonnes and under 30 per cent recycled content. Refill is a labelling problem before it is a hygiene one.

  • EPR: 25 t and £1m turnover
  • PPT: 10 t, 30% recycled
  • PPWR applies 12 August 2026
  • PP tube: 9 g pack per 4.5 g balm

What "recyclable" means once a pack reaches a sorting line

Recyclability is four separate things and a pack has to pass all of them. It must be collected from the household, sorted into a clean material stream, accepted by a reprocessor, and have an end market for the output. Most balm packaging fails at the second step, and the reason is mechanical rather than chemical.

A materials recovery facility begins with a trommel or a set of disc screens that split the stream by size and by whether an item is two dimensional (paper, film) or three dimensional (containers). Anything smaller than roughly 40 to 50 mm in two dimensions drops out with the fines, which go to residue or to low grade aggregate. An eddy current separator will throw non-ferrous metal off the belt with real efficiency, but only if the item is still on the belt when it gets there. A 45 mm lip balm tin, a 20 mm cap and a 15 mm elevator disc are all below the screen.

The second failure is composition. Sorting equipment reads the dominant surface, so a paperboard tube with a polyethylene inner liner sorts as paper and is then rejected at the pulper, where the liner floats off as reject. Fats behave the same way. Fibre reprocessing is wet pulping, and residual balm on the inside of a board tube is a contaminant in exactly the stream the tube was chosen to enter.

Collection is the part that is improving. Under England's Simpler Recycling policy the same core set of dry recyclables, plastic, metal, glass, paper and card, plus food waste, became a requirement for workplaces with ten or more employees from 31 March 2025 and for households from 31 March 2026, with plastic film added from 31 March 2027. Consistency at the kerb does not change the screen size inside the plant, so it improves the odds for a 60 mm jar and does nothing for a 45 mm tin.

The four balm formats, ranked by what is actually recovered

The four common anhydrous formats against each stage of the recovery chain. Collection reflects UK kerbside practice; the sorting column reflects the size and composition constraints described above rather than any single plant.
FormatCollected?Sorted?Reprocessed?Realistic verdict
Aluminium slip-lid or screw-lid tinYes, all metalsOnly if above about 50 mmYes, aluminium is the most valuable streamBest material, marginal format. A 60 mm salve tin gets through; a 45 mm lip tin usually does not.
Glass jar with a plastic lidYes, kerbside or bottle bankYes for the jar, no for the lidYes, though much mixed cullet is downcycled to aggregateGood, if the lid is separated and the glass is plain container glass rather than a decorated or coated cosmetic jar.
Polypropylene twist-up tubeYes in principle, PP is a collected polymerNo, too small and multi-componentYes, if it ever arrivedNot recovered in practice. Four parts, three of them under 30 mm, one of them a metal or nylon screw.
Paperboard push-up tubeYes, paper is collected everywhereSorts as paperRejected if lined or oil soakedThe worst of the four despite the best perception. Balm-contaminated fibre with a liner is a pulper reject.

That ranking is uncomfortable because it inverts the marketing. The board tube reads as the plastic-free option and is the one least likely to become anything. The tin reads as an indulgence and is made of the material with the strongest recycling economics: recycled aluminium takes roughly five per cent of the energy of primary aluminium, which is why scrap has real value and why aluminium is chased through a plant rather than tolerated. Glass recycling saves far less energy, around a quarter, and glass is heavy, so its case rests on collection rates and inertness rather than on carbon. The format comparison for lip balm specifically is set out on lip balm tube versus tin, and the wider selection question, including closures and liners, is on the packaging guide.

Note

None of this is a life cycle assessment. A proper comparison would weigh production energy, transport distance, fill weight, breakage rate and the number of reuses, and the ranking flips depending on which of those dominates. A heavy glass jar shipped 200 miles and refilled ten times beats a light tube shipped 200 miles and binned once. What the table above settles is only the recovery question, which is the one people get wrong.

Pack weight per unit, and why the lightest pack is not automatically the best

Typical supplier-quoted component weights for common balm formats, with the pack weight expressed per gram of product. Wall thickness varies by up to 20 per cent between suppliers, so weigh your own samples before using these for a tonnage return.
PackBalm held (g)Pack weight (g)Pack per g of balmMaterial split
Paperboard push-up tube4.530.67Board, often with a liner or a plastic base plug
Aluminium slider tin, 0.15 oz4.2551.18Aluminium, single material
Polypropylene twist-up tube4.592.00PP barrel, cap, elevator, plus a screw
Aluminium screw-lid tin, 30 mL25130.52Aluminium, with a board or EPE liner in the lid
Glass jar, 30 mL, with PP lid28461.6442 g glass, 4 g PP lid and liner
Tinplate salve tin, 60 mL50220.44Steel, single material

Two things fall out. The twist-up tube is the worst ratio on the board, two grams of unrecovered polypropylene for every gram of balm, which is a consequence of the mechanism rather than of anyone's carelessness. And the larger the pack, the better the ratio gets, so the single biggest packaging reduction available to a small maker is to sell a 50 g tin instead of four 12 g ones. That is also a pricing decision, worked through on costing and pricing.

UK Extended Producer Responsibility: two thresholds, two very different duties

The Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024 replaced the old packaging recovery note system across the United Kingdom. They apply in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, are enforced by the four environmental regulators, and are run by a single scheme administrator. Two tests decide what you owe, and you have to meet both parts of a tier to fall into it.

  • Under £1 million turnover, or under 25 tonnes of packaging a year: no obligation at all. Most makers are here.
  • Over £1 million turnover and over 25 tonnes: a small producer. You must register and report your packaging data. You do not pay disposal fees.
  • Over £2 million turnover and over 50 tonnes: a large producer. You register, report twice a year, pay the disposal fees below, and buy recycling evidence.

The tonnage is the trap, because it is not just the pack the customer keeps. It counts primary packaging, the outer carton, the shipping box, the void fill, the tape and the pallet wrap, for everything you supply filled to a UK end user or import filled. A maker sending 400 mail orders a month in 60 g boxes is generating nearly 300 kg a year of board before any tins are counted. It is still an order of magnitude below 25 tonnes, which at 9 g a tube is 2.8 million units, so the threshold reliably catches you at about the point you also acquire staff and an accountant.

Defra base fees for the 2025/26 charging year, rounded to the nearest ten pounds per tonne, with the cost of one unit worked from the pack weights above. Fees are recalculated each year from local authority costs, so treat the ranking as durable and the figures as a snapshot. Only large producers pay them.
MaterialBase fee (£/tonne)Cost of one balm pack
Fibre-based composite460The most expensive material on the list, which is what a lined board tube is
Plastic4200.38 p for a 9 g PP tube
Aluminium2700.14 p for a 5 g slider tin
Steel2600.57 p for a 22 g tinplate salve tin
Wood260Pallets and crates, not retail packs
Paper or board2001.2 p for a 60 g mailing box
Glass1900.80 p for a 42 g jar

Read the right-hand column carefully. For a large producer, the cardboard box that carries the order costs more in disposal fees than the pack inside it, because board is heavy relative to a tin even though its rate per tonne is the lowest on the table. Fee modulation by recyclability is scheduled to begin from the 2026/27 charging year, using an assessment method that grades each pack red, amber or green, so a format that cannot be sorted will attract a higher rate than the same material in a sortable form. The wider regulatory picture for a UK or EU seller is on selling balms in the UK and EU.

Plastic Packaging Tax: 30 per cent recycled content, 10 tonnes, per component

Plastic Packaging Tax was introduced by Part 2 of the Finance Act 2021 and is administered by HMRC. It applies to plastic packaging components manufactured in or imported into the United Kingdom that contain less than 30 per cent recycled plastic by weight. The registration threshold is 10 tonnes of finished plastic packaging components in a rolling twelve month period, tested both backwards and forwards, and you must register within 30 days of crossing it.

The rate was £200 per tonne from April 2022, £210.82 from April 2023 and £217.85 from April 2024, and it is uprated each April in line with CPI, so check the current figure with HMRC before you cost anything. At those rates a taxable 9 g tube carries about 0.2 p of tax. The rate is trivial per unit; the threshold is the whole story, and 10 tonnes of 9 g tubes is roughly 1.1 million of them.

Three details catch people out. The test is applied component by component, so a barrel moulded from 30 per cent recycled polypropylene and a cap moulded from virgin resin are assessed separately and the cap is taxable. Importing filled packaging counts: if you buy in finished, filled product for resale, the plastic packaging around it is yours for tax purposes. And if you are near but under the threshold you still need records capable of demonstrating that you are under it.

Careful

The two regimes push design in opposite directions. Plastic Packaging Tax rewards recycled content and is indifferent to whether the pack can be sorted. Modulated EPR fees reward sortability and are indifferent to recycled content. A 100 per cent recycled polypropylene lip balm tube satisfies the tax perfectly and is still a component that no sorting plant will recover. Design for one and you have not designed for the other.

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 and the dates that will reach a small brand

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste replaces Directive 94/62/EC. It entered into force on 11 February 2025 and applies from 12 August 2026. Being a regulation rather than a directive, it takes effect without national transposition, which is why its dates are worth diarising rather than waiting for a domestic version.

Jurisdiction first, because this is where UK makers go wrong. It applies across the European Union and, under the Windsor Framework, in Northern Ireland. It does not apply in Great Britain. It does apply to anything a Great Britain business places on the EU or Northern Ireland market, which includes a single tin sold through a website to a customer in Dublin or Belfast.

Key dates in Regulation (EU) 2025/40 for a cosmetic packer. Several requirements depend on implementing acts that were not final at the time of writing, so confirm the detail against the current consolidated text.
DateWhat changes
12 August 2026General application. Registration with the national producer register in each member state where you sell.
12 August 2028Harmonised material composition labelling on packaging, replacing the patchwork of national sorting symbols.
1 January 2030All packaging must be designed for recycling and meet a minimum performance grade. Minimum recycled content in plastic packaging begins. Empty space in grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging capped at 50 per cent. Annex V bans take effect.
1 January 2035Packaging must additionally be recycled at scale, assessed against actual collected and sorted tonnages.
1 January 2038Higher recycled content targets across all plastic packaging categories.

Two provisions bite specifically on balms. Packaging for cosmetic products under Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is treated as contact sensitive, which sets the 2030 recycled content target for a cosmetic polypropylene tube at 10 per cent rather than the 35 per cent applied to general plastic packaging, with a higher figure from 2038. And the Annex V list of prohibited single-use formats includes small plastic packaging for cosmetic, hygiene and toiletry products supplied in the accommodation sector, the hotel miniature, below 50 mL for liquids or 100 g for solids. If part of your business is hotel amenity balms sold into the EU, that line ends on 1 January 2030 for plastic packs.

Recycled resin in practice: what changes on the moulding floor

Post-consumer recycled polypropylene is not a drop-in substitute for virgin resin, and the differences show up in the finished pack rather than on the certificate.

  • Colour. Recovered PP arrives as a mixture of everything that was ever moulded in PP, so the base is grey, beige or olive. You cannot make a bright white, a clear or a pastel tube from high-recycled-content PP without pigment loading that pushes the pack opaque. Deep colours and black work; brand colours often do not.
  • Batch variation. Melt flow index drifts between lots, which shifts mould shrinkage, which shifts the bore of a twist-up barrel. A tube that fits its elevator disc on one lot can bind on the next, which is one of the causes explored on why a lip balm will not twist up.
  • Impact strength. Repeated processing shortens chains. Recycled barrels are more brittle in cold weather, and brittleness in a filled tube shows as the crazing described on tubes cracking or crazing.
  • Odour and migration. Recovered polymer carries residual odour, and a fragranced anhydrous product is an excellent solvent for whatever migrates out of the wall. This belongs in your compatibility testing, not in a hope, and the method is on packaging compatibility.
  • Cost. Expect a premium of roughly 8 to 20 per cent over virgin at 2025 to 2026 European prices. It is not stable: the premium narrows when virgin resin is expensive and widens when oil is cheap, so a costing built on last year's spread will be wrong.

On the compliance side, recycled plastics for food contact are controlled in the EU by Regulation (EU) 2022/1616, which authorises only specified recycling technologies. Cosmetics sit outside that regulation, but safety assessors borrow its logic, and you still have to satisfy the general safety obligation in Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 for the finished product in its container. In practice that means a supplier declaration for the resin and migration evidence in the product information file, which is part of what a safety assessment and CPSR covers.

Refills for anhydrous balms: water activity decides, the label constrains

A fully anhydrous balm has a water activity in the region of 0.2 to 0.4. Bacteria generally need about 0.87 and above to grow, most moulds about 0.80, and even the most xerophilic moulds and osmophilic yeasts stop around 0.61. A balm is therefore not a growth medium, which is why it does not need a preservative, as set out on whether balms need preservatives. Refilling does not change that as long as the product stays anhydrous.

What breaks it is water arriving with the container. A jar washed and put away damp holds free water at aw 1.0 against the fat, and that interface is where colonies appear in products that were supposedly anhydrous, the mechanism behind water contamination in balm. The second failure is not microbial at all: residual old balm in a returned container is further through its oxidative induction period and seeds the fresh fill, which is the chain described on rancidity and oxidation.

  1. Run an exchange pool, not a counter fill. Take the empty back, give out a sanitised one you prepared. Filling a customer's own container at a market stall gives you no control over what has been in it and no way to inspect it properly.
  2. Wash above the melt range. Domestic hot water runs at about 50 to 55 C, below the melting range of every structurant you use, so it moves solid wax around rather than removing it. Use water above 65 C with detergent for beeswax, higher for candelilla or carnauba.
  3. Dry completely, then sanitise. Oven at 60 to 80 C or a drying rack until there is no film anywhere, then 70 per cent isopropyl alcohol and let it flash off. The alcohol is the last step because it needs a dry surface to work on. The general standard is on workshop hygiene.
  4. Reject the damaged ones. Scratched polypropylene holds residue in the scratches. Tins with any rust go out, for the reasons on rust spots on balm tins.
  5. Relabel and re-record. A refill is a new supply of a cosmetic product. It needs a new batch code, a new date of minimum durability or period after opening, and the full legally required label, and it needs an entry in your batch records.

That last step is the one that stops most refill schemes, and it is a labelling requirement rather than a hygiene one. Under Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, retained in Great Britain, the mandatory particulars have to be on the container and the outer packaging at the point the product is made available. A refill handed over in a customer's unlabelled tin is non-compliant however clean the tin is. Design the scheme around a wraparound label you apply at fill, not around a customer's own jar. What has to appear on it is on labelling cosmetics in the UK.

Green claims: the wording that fails

The Competition and Markets Authority published the Green Claims Code in 2021 with six principles: claims must be truthful and accurate, clear and unambiguous, must not omit or hide important information, must make fair comparisons, must consider the full life cycle, and must be substantiated. What changed is enforcement. The unfair commercial practices provisions of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 came into force on 6 April 2025 and let the CMA act directly, with penalties of up to 10 per cent of global turnover, rather than having to go to court first.

Common packaging claims assessed against the CMA Green Claims Code principles, with wording that survives the same test.
Claim as writtenWhy it failsWording that holds
"Eco-friendly packaging"Generic, unqualified and about the whole life cycle, which you have not assessed"Aluminium tin. Recycled where your council collects small metal items."
"100% recyclable" on a twist-up tubeTechnically true, practically false. Omits that it is not sorted at that size"Not currently sorted for recycling at this size. Send it back to us and we will."
"Plastic free" on a lined board tubeUntrue if there is a liner, a plug or a laminate"Paperboard tube with a plastic base plug. Pull the plug out before recycling the board."
"Biodegradable"Meaningless without a standard, an environment and a timescale"Certified industrially compostable to EN 13432. Needs an industrial composter, not a home heap or a food waste bin."
"Carbon neutral"Offset-based neutrality is under active scrutiny and is being banned outright in the EUState what you measured and what you reduced, and name the scope.
"Sustainable packaging"The CMA's standing example of a claim that cannot be substantiated as writtenName the specific attribute: recycled content by percentage, refillable, mono-material.
"Made with recycled materials"Omits which component and how much, so it reads as though the whole pack qualifies"Carton is 80 per cent recycled board. The tin is virgin aluminium."

The European rules are moving further. Directive (EU) 2024/825 on empowering consumers for the green transition must be transposed by 27 March 2026 and applies from 27 September 2026. It bans generic environmental claims where excellent recognised environmental performance cannot be demonstrated, bans claims that a product is carbon neutral on the basis of offsetting, and restricts sustainability labels to certified schemes. A separate substantiation directive was still under negotiation and should not be assumed. Claims about the balm itself rather than the box are a different regime again, covered on cosmetic versus drug claims, and the vocabulary problems around natural and clean are on chemical free and clean beauty claims.

The decision rule, and what this page cannot settle

Choose a format on three questions in this order. Does your customer's collection service take it and will a plant sort it? Can you operate a return, so that recovery does not depend on the kerbside at all? Can you defend, in writing, the sentence you want to print about it? A format that fails the third question is a liability regardless of how it performs on the first two.

Applied to balms, that gives one clear answer and one honest non-answer. Above about 15 g of product, an aluminium or tinplate screw-lid tin operated with an exchange and refill scheme is the best available combination: a single material, a valuable stream, a diameter that clears the sorting screen, a low pack-to-product ratio, and claims you can substantiate line by line. Below about 6 g there is no good option. The polypropylene tube is not recovered, the board tube is contaminated fibre, and the tin is under the screen. Say that on the pack instead of choosing a symbol, and take the format decision on other grounds, such as the fill and finish differences on filling lip balm tubes.

Four things this page cannot decide for you. Your tonnage, which you get by weighing your own components and multiplying by units shipped, per material, per year, including the shipper. Your turnover position against the two EPR tiers, which is an accounting question. Whether your specific pack is collected where your specific customers live, which varies by local authority. And whether a claim you want to make is substantiated, which needs evidence held on file before publication, not after a complaint. Fee tables, tax rates and implementing acts all change annually, so the figures here are dated by their sources and the thresholds are the durable part.

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to register for packaging EPR as a small balm maker?

Only if you meet both parts of a tier. Under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024 you report data if your turnover exceeds £1 million and you supply more than 25 tonnes of packaging a year, and you additionally pay disposal fees above £2 million and 50 tonnes. Below either figure in a tier there is no obligation, and 25 tonnes is roughly 2.8 million lip balm tubes.

Will I ever pay Plastic Packaging Tax?

Almost certainly not as a hobby or market-stall maker. The threshold is 10 tonnes of finished plastic packaging components manufactured in or imported into the UK in a twelve month period, which is over a million 9 g tubes. The tax applies to components with under 30 per cent recycled plastic by weight, assessed component by component, so a recycled barrel with a virgin cap is only partly exempt.

Are lip balm tubes recyclable?

In laboratory terms yes, in practice no. Polypropylene is a collected polymer, but a twist-up tube is four parts, three of them below the 40 to 50 mm screen size used to sort a materials recovery facility stream, and one of them a metal or nylon screw. Items that small drop out with the fines and go to residue. A takeback scheme is the only route that actually recovers them.

Is a cardboard lip balm tube better for the environment than a plastic one?

Not reliably. It is lighter, roughly 3 g against 9 g, and it is made from a renewable fibre. But it usually has a plastic liner or base plug, it is saturated with balm by the time it is empty, and oily fibre with a liner is rejected at the pulper. It sorts as paper and then fails, so its real recovery rate can be lower than the tube it replaced.

Can I refill a customer's own tin at a market?

You can refill a tin, but not usually theirs, and not without relabelling. A refill is a new supply of a cosmetic product, so it needs the full mandatory label on the container, a batch code and a durability date. Run an exchange pool of containers you have washed above 65 C, dried completely and sanitised with 70 per cent isopropyl alcohol, and apply a fresh label at fill.

Can I call my packaging eco-friendly or sustainable?

Not as a bare claim. The CMA Green Claims Code requires claims to be specific, substantiated and to consider the full life cycle, and since 6 April 2025 the CMA can fine directly under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024. Replace the adjective with a fact you can evidence: the material, the recycled percentage by component, or the takeback scheme you actually operate.

Does the EU packaging regulation apply to me if I am in Britain?

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 does not apply in Great Britain, but it applies in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework and to anything you place on the EU or Northern Ireland market, including a single order posted to a customer there. It applies from 12 August 2026, with design-for-recycling and recycled content requirements from 1 January 2030.

Sources and further reading

  1. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Extended producer responsibility for packaging: who is affected and what to do, GOV.UK, for the turnover and tonnage thresholds and the reporting duties under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024.
  2. HM Revenue and Customs, Check if you need to register for Plastic Packaging Tax, GOV.UK, for the 10 tonne threshold, the 30 per cent recycled content test and the current rate.
  3. European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste, EUR-Lex, including Annex V on prohibited single-use formats and the recycled content targets for contact sensitive packaging.
  4. Competition and Markets Authority, Green Claims Code: making environmental claims, GOV.UK, 2021.
  5. European Parliament and Council, Directive (EU) 2024/825 on empowering consumers for the green transition, EUR-Lex.
  6. European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products, EUR-Lex, Article 19 on labelling of the container and outer packaging.
  7. International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods, Microorganisms in Foods 5: Microbiological Specifications of Food Pathogens, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1996, for the minimum water activity limits for microbial growth.

Reviewed and updated 6 September 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix and log it.